Hinduism and Buddhism Essay -- Religion religious Compare Contrast Ess

Hinduism and BuddhismThe idea of beau idealIt is first of every necessary to establish what is meant by the circumstance God. This term is used to designate a Supreme being endowed with the qualities of omnipotence and omniscience, which is the creator of the universe with all its contents, and the chief lawgiver for humans. God is generally considered as being concerned with the welfare of his human creatures, and the crowning(prenominal) salvation of those who follow his dictates. God is therefore a person of whatever gracious, and the question whether such an entity exists or not is fundamental to all theistic systems.In contrast to this notion of a ad hominem God about modern theologians have interpreted the term God as representing close to kind of abstract principle of good. This view was first developed in the ancient Indian Upanishads where God is equated with an abstract principle, the Brahman. The ancient Indian philosophers could carry such a view because they also had a theory of karma, which rightfully does away with the need for a personal God. Buddhists too have a theory of karma, which is different from that of the Hindus, and which even more unequivocally dispenses with the need for a deity. The use of the term God to denote an abstract reality by monotheistic theologians who have no theory of karma is difficult to justify, consequently this is merely a device to explain away the contradictions that arise from the notion of a personal God. In fact the actual practice of theistic religion harvesting as if God is a real person of some kind or other.BuddhismBuddhist godsBuddhism has 33 Gods the most potent ane of them all is Indra. It is Buddhist beliefs that the gods and spirits are with us persistently. The smokestack Meru can be compared with mount Olympus of the Greek gods. Buddhists believe that on top of this sacred mountain are the 33 gods with Indra as their principal. Buddhism primary principal is chaste potency and exe rcises. It is concluded in three regions. The first is the principles of lecherousness, which belongs to the realm of animals, humans and diverse divine essences. The realm of the gods consists of six levels, which are the liberation of material desires. The attendant region compromises entities that are born in the dominion of the Braham gods liberated from lust and wishes, they constitute a term of embodiment. They divide in four stages wh... ...e if one means by originality an idea or an utterance not give previously in any creed or philosophy, or neer before inculcated by any moral and spiritual leader, then for certain you cannot find it anywhere. Neither Abraham nor Moses nor Jesus nor Buddha nor Muhammed said anything that could not be put up either in the religious tradition in which they were born or in creeds and philosophies in other times and places. Many of the great moral teachers often make a direct reference to others, and even if they do not, one can relate t heir ideas to something that has gone before.To PernillaThank you for being patient of and I apologize for not turning it in the day I was to. Enjoy your trip. SourcesInternetwww.hinduweb.comwww.islam-guide.comwww.buddhanet.comCD-ROM encyclopaediaWebsters concise interactive EncyclopediaPrinted in 1996 by Merriam-WebsterMicrosoft Encarta Uppslagsverk 2001Printed in 2001 by Microsoft CorporationBooksReligions for TodayAuthour Roger colourStanley Thornes Publisher LtdPrinted in 1991The New Websters International Encyclopedia rewrite Edition1998 Edition and published by Trident Press International