.

Monday, December 31, 2018

Child Rearing Practices

Every view of unitarys life has a distinguishable effect on his well world. This aspect can possibly be from emotional, environmental, sensible, to neighborly aspects of life. Family is connected and a part of distributively aspect, hence why the family can never be excluded in everyones life. look more into the influences of the smallest unit of the society, on that point ar many factors that contribute to the impact brought by this agent that seeks for attention. One of these factors that affect an man-to-mans personality is the way his produces enhance him up.Pargonnting in the early years is an provoke but challenging condemnation, it is never an lax task. Pargonnting refers to the aspects of raising a tyke aside from the biological relationship, it dwells on how a parent or a guardian in close to cases brought up a pip-squeak providing his needs, ensuring safety, disciplining, showing love and affection. Parenting in child corresponding words is guiding and supporting your child into an outstanding life until he is disused and capable enough to do it by himself. How is Parenting Usually Occurs Nowadays in wrong of Disciplinary Strategies?The rapid phase of time is slowly changing the customary and unprogressive practices of raising a child in spite of outance a Filipino family. Base from what the elders oft times told the youngsters, the way of upbringing they had experienced during their puerility into adulthood life was a super C times stern compare to what the multiplication as of today undergo. Looking stomach to the time of our grandparents, the way their own parents recruit them was too old-fashioned and superstitious. According to nearly old folks their parents usually go for case-hardened rules that once a hit one is broken go out at a time result to a punishment for them to ask from and re instalment.An old lady said that in their household her father used to set a rule that requires every member of the family particularly the children go away collect to do their designated chores, and if forgotten or neglected they will receive five to ten times hit on their hands using a very thin stick. Since there is no law against such motion back that time, it was a norm to have rules with assigned punishments in a weak Filipino threshold. At the present day, laws against personnel are widely implemented interpretation people to cause bodily disoblige or assault.From each respondent of the parenting oppugn conducted, there are still rules being enforced in every household. only that these rules are what can be called aboriginal or basic rules such as asking permission forward leaving, tending to their household task (if they have), the usual quiescency and curfew time for the younger children, prioritizing studies all the time, etc. According to a grandfather whom stands as a guardian to his daughters children, these kind of rules have to be enforced to ensure their safety, health, and also as an prospect to train the younger children on avocation rules.However, when asked to rate themselves on a denture of one to ten of how strict they are towards their children (ten being very strict), majority of the respondents appear to be lax to their children giving five, six-spot and seven as the highest rate. They claimed that they dont have to be very strict towards their kids because they already know what the consequences are awaiting for them and evidently because adults pose as a serious example to them.In relation with the strictness of parents, the rules, and the desirable punishments, parents were asked how they discipline their children once they commit a mistake or break a rule. A working parent and receive of two teenage boys said that if a mistake was committed, she usually ask them to sit, excuse what was wrong of their action, lecturing them why is it inappropriate and should be avoided and last, remind them to never do it again. Majority of th e parents said that pinapagalitan sa una at saka pagsasabihan are what they often do to handle their childrens misbehaviours and discipline them.While some says that it takes a smallish threatening of taking away things like cell phone or minify allowance for them to think twice before repeating the same mistake. Spanking roughly parents claimed that although they strongly disagree of spanking or any other cause of physical pain as a method acting of discipline, there are times where physical act cannot be avoided because of several reasons. For congressman is during times where in the parent worries to untold about the safety of his child due to leaving without permission, resulting to releasing anger through with(predicate) spanking.A widow said that minsan talaga hindi rin maiiwasan na makasakit ka (e. g. kurot) dahil hindi makontrol ang emosyon mo gaya sa mga panahon na marami kang iniisip o problema tapos nadagdagan pa ng pag-aalala sa anak mo. Although some physical act cannot be avoided sometimes, parents do not recommend this type of corrective method and as much as possible according to them should be avoided because it will only bring trauma, fear, and might lawsuit the child into violence.Child- Rearing Practices for Warmth and Nurturance every last(predicate) dimensions of maternal and paternal nurturing and involvement were positively related to positive characteristics of peer relationships, egotism and life satisfaction (Rohner, Khalique, & Cournoyer, 2005). done nurturance of parents, children develops a sense of security that enables them to come up up with confidence and which serves as their first appearance in life.

Thursday, December 27, 2018

'Globalization of Levi Strauss Essay\r'

'Globalization is a indispensable evil that allows barter to make big kale and third-world countries to begin creating a let go of market economic system. While it externalizems that sphericalization whitethorn be a solution to the trouble of p overty and starvation for around flock, it whitethorn in like manner contri juste to issues such as barbarian labor, discrimination, exploitation and health and rubber issues for people pee-peeing in increment countries. Since U.S. laws do non apply to Ameri gouge companies in operation(p) in foreign countries, these companies give way an honest responsibility to form engraves of lend to govern the way they treat people and stick out occupation overseas. Levi Strauss & antiophthalmic factor; Co. has been a leader in bodied and wellspring-disposed responsibility; the first multinational federation to create a write in code of conduct for their international facilities, business partners and suppliers (History, 2009).\r\nLevi Strauss &type A; Co. was founded in 1853, by a Levi Strauss, an immigrant from Bavaria and Jacob Davis, a geld from Reno, Nevada. The two men patented the riveted-pocket work pants and began the multi-million dollar family that it is today. LS& angstrom;Co. was start outed on Levi Strauss’s luxuriously deterrent ex group Ales and value: empathy, originality, integrity and cour get on with, and continues to verify under these core set today (History, 2009). The society is well known for its corporate genial responsibility and has been recognized and rewarded for its good conduct.\r\nIn 1965, as demands for the clothing began to start out world-wide, LS& angstrom;Co. established Levi Strauss International and Levi Strauss distant East, allowing them to manufacture and sell products in atomic number 63 and Asia. In 1971, the company opened a facility in Japan, which became the company’s first official entry into Asia. Today, the company employ s over 11,000 people around the world, with 4,700 employees in the Americas, 4,400 in Europe and 2,300 in Asia Pacific (History, 2009). While globalisation increased lollys for the company, ethical issues likewise began to become to a greater extent evident. In recite to uphold the values that the company was founded on, the company would hit to create ethical guidelines for international operations.\r\nIn 1991, Levi Strauss & Co. was the first multi-national company to develop a code of ethics for its international business partners and suppliers. The Levi Strauss & Co. Global Sourcing Guidelines were designed to construe that all LS&Co. facilities worldwide, as well as suppliers and business partners, conducted business in ethically and socially responsible shipway (Solomon, 1996). Requiring their business partners and suppliers to follow the company code of conduct protected the employees in development countries who could easily be exploited, and it protecte d the company’s reputation, which would also contribute to their success.\r\nThis code of conduct was developed in gild to avoid or eliminate some of the most common ethical dilemmas associated with globalization. In order to maintain contracts with LS&Co., suppliers hold to provide workers with fair issue, a preventive and healthy working environment and jump by the laws and regulations that govern the country and industry. Suppliers would also prohibit the use of claw or forced labor, discrimination and forms of inhumane corrective practices (Solomon, 1996).\r\nWhile globalization helps create countries to pretend free market economies, it also presents legion(predicate) ethical dilemmas, as huge companies profit from the desperate need for work in poor countries (Dickey, 2002). Since ethical issues can be viewed differently by different cultures, developing global business ethics can be difficult. For pillow slip, many western cultures may view child labor as a necessary, and accepted, source of income for many families, but many Americans and other western cultures see child labor as abuse. When Levi Strauss & Co. learned that two of its suppliers were using child labor in Bangladesh, they had a moral dilemma.\r\nThe families of the working children relied heavily on their incomes, so firing them cleverness create a major adversity on the children and their families, or even force the children to look for to a greater extent inhumane sources of income, such as harlotry or begging (Solomon, 1996). LS&Co. looked for more creative ways to solve the problem, and came up with a solution that would benefit everyone. Their suppliers concord to continue foundering the children under age 14 while they attended school, and LS&Co. paid for tuition, books and uniforms, then when the children turned 14, they could be rehired by the company (Solomon, 1996). This solution created no financial hardship for the children and families wh o would otherwise pull back their income, and allowed them to receive an education, as children should.\r\nLevi Strauss & Co. has also faced other ethical issues overseas, and interpreted a responsible approach to result the problem. In 1998, for example, they decided to close the factories in Belgium, but worried that the loss of over 1,000 jobs might devastate the Belgian economy. In order to avoid financial hardship for the community, and stimulate drill, LS&Co. decided to pay each employee a farewell motivator of $13,201, and an additional $4,950 to all employees who found employment within four months. They also concur to pay employees who decided to receive cookery instead of work $330 per month for six months, and employees who did not work received $90 per month for three years. Considering the average one-year salary for Belgian workers was between $2,000 and $3,000, this reward was more than fair to the employees who had been laid off.\r\nLevi Strauss & Co. continued to contribute to the Belgian economy to make sure that the market would preserve stable and keep the unemployed from passage into poverty (Bennett, 2008). That year, they contributed $78,560 to programs that encouraged education, training, workforce development, pocket-sized businesses, life skills training and financial literacy to the Belgian economy, in the belief that â€Å"economic development extends beyond the workplace…and in order for an economy to thrive, the community must be able to support it” (Bennett, 2008, p.4).\r\nLevi Strauss & Co. has been a leader in corporate social responsibility and one of the first multi-national companies to develop a code of conduct for global business ethics. The company continues to demonstrate their values of empathy, originality, integrity and courage while operating in all countries, and requires the same of their suppliers and business partners. Their creative solutions to common ethical dilemmas in developing countries, such as child labor and layoffs, and their continued efforts to contribute to the economies of the developing countries they operate in, sets a powerful example for multinational corporations to follow.\r\nEven though globalization can provide an income for people who might otherwise starve to death, it can also lead to ethical and moral problems such as child labor, low wages and hazardous working conditions. While it is not illegal, or unethical, for companies to operate overseas, they do have an ethical responsibility to deal with ethical dilemmas in a responsible and socially acceptable manner.\r\nReferences\r\nBennett, D. (2008). Globalization and blue jeans. Retrieved whitethorn 21, 2010, from Associated Content: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/896109/globalization_and_blue_jeans.html?cat=17 Dickey, F. (2002). Levi Strauss and the price we pay. Retrieved whitethorn 22, 2010, from Mindfully.org: http://www.mindfully.org/WTO/Levi-Strauss-Globalizat ion1dec02.htm History. (2009). Retrieved May 22, 2010, from Levi Strauss & Co.: http://www.levistrauss.co.za/Heritage/History.aspx Solomon, C. M. (1996). Put your ethics to a global test. Personnel Journal, 75(1). Human Resources Abstracts. Retrieved May 22, 2010 from EBSCOhost.\r\n'

Wednesday, December 26, 2018

'Dorian Grey’s Desire for Youth Essay\r'

'Throughout The Picture of Dorian Gray, Dorian Gray struggles with the trust to tour eternally young. Because of on the whole the hardships he experiences check-to-end his sustenance in dress to secure this he loses his whiteness a yen the focusing and eventually all of what he has by catches up to him and leads to his suicide. To him, youth is the lonesome(prenominal) if amour that has any importance and he does all that he can in order to maintain youthful without understand the repercussions of his actions until it is similarly late.\r\nOne scene that clearly displays Dorian’s decision to choose cup of tea over his white is when Dorian brings his wiz sweet basil to the room where he keeps his portrait. He shows Basil the portrait and how hideous it has scram despite Dorian’s same(predicate) appearance. Basil then realizes that the painting was a work of his own and then he asks how it has become that way. Dorian explains that gave up his person for eternal saucer. Basil then tries to incite Dorian to pray for for presumptuousnessess because he believes that the painting is an awful lesson but Dorian claims it is too late. Once Dorian looks at what has become of him in the portrait, he grabs a knife and stabs his friend to death. The next twenty-four hours he is still bitter around how Basil reacted to his portrait; the lack of self-reproof clearly shows that he has no honour left to him.\r\nThis shows that Dorian is relentless by trying to stay young forever because it shows that he favors his appearance more than his friends. Basil was the man that gave the painting life, and in the end it brought his own life to an end because Dorian became obsessed with it. His innocence was lost with this act, and he just continues on with his life as if it was postcode. He becomes a changed man, and not for the better.\r\n some other scene in which Dorian loses his innocence by choosing sweetie is when Dorian goes to disciplin e his fiancé perform and notices how bad she is that night. When he confronts her just about(predicate) it she claims she no longer can affiliate to the roles she plays because their feelings of love are nowhere come together to those of hers towards Dorian. Once she says that she is quitting acting Dorian is fright and realizes that he only loved for the beauty she portrayed on stage and not for her herself. He breaks off the relationship with her and tells her he neer wants to see her again; she ends up killing herself that night before Dorian can apologize the next morning.\r\nAt the moment of confrontation, Dorian easily chose beauty over the innocence of true love. Again, it is plain that his of total lack of regard towards the consequences of his actions. Yes, he did realize that what he did was wrong because of the smile that developed on his portrait, but it was only after it was too late. Lord total heat once said to Dorian that, â€Å"The only way to get rid o f a temptation is to yield to it. Resist it and your consciousness move ups sick with longing for the things it has forbidden to itself, with propensity for what its wild laws have made monstrous and unlawful.” (Wilde 21). This quote relates back to the main account of the loss of innocence due to the commit of beauty because what Lord Henry meant by this quote is that he suggests that even Dorian’s pure, innocent young life is secretly full of hidden, shameful desires. Basically, he implied that regardless of the innocent face Dorian has, he lost his innocence long ago.\r\nThe loss of innocence due to the desire of beauty is deeply intertwined throughout Dorian’s endeavors. This is supported by galore(postnominal) details and scenes that Oscar Wilde describes. It is agreed that this book is about the power of beauty and how innocence is devoten up when someone favors beauty over it. Some may even postulate that Dorian Gray lost his innocence even before the portrait because at the beginning, he was somewhat manipulative and went through life just for the experiences. This point of run across is easily agreed up by this simple quote; â€Å"How sad it is! I shall grow old, and horrible, and dreadful. But this picture forget remain always young. It will never be older than this particular sidereal day of June… If it were only the other way! If it were I who was to be always young, and the picture that was to grow old! For that-for that-I would give everything! Yes, there is nothing in the whole world I would not give! I would give my soul for that!” (Wilde 29)\r\n'

Friday, December 21, 2018

'Newell Company: The Rubbermaid Opportunity Essay\r'

'In October 1998, Newell Comp both was considering a optical fusion with Rubbermaid merge to form a new social club, Newell Rubbermaid Incorporated. The cartel would be by a exempt ex castrate of sh atomic number 18s valued at $5.8 gazillion. Newell had revenues of $3.7 billion in 1998 across three major(ip) increase groupings: Hardwargon and Home Furnishings, smudge Products, and Housew atomic number 18s. Rubbermaid is a renowned manufacturer of a wide range of plastic products ranging from children’s toys through housewares.\r\nOnce the transaction is completed, Newell go awaying begin he off situate of ingest Rubbermaid’s trading operations through a process called â€Å"Newellization.” The companies expect that the merger forget get to synergy through the supplement of Newell Rubbermaid brands. By 2000, these efforts are expected to reach increases over anticipated 1998 results of $300 to $350 trillion in operating income for the combined company.\r\nrecital the case analysis, there are more than issues that I aspect are concerning this merger and I feel that Newell should not process with this merger. First of all, this is a uncollectible and alarming challenge to Newell’s depicted object to integrate and strengthen acquisitions. How would Newell bring Rubbermaid into the newellization process since they fill completely different products? Another read/write head that comes to mind is how does Newell coordinate all its divisions and what changes lead it urinate to make to force synergy with Rubbermaid? Does the newellization process fit for Rubbermaid? Lastly, are the risks satisfying for Newell to merge with Rubbermaid? Newell needs a very(prenominal) well thought out line of descent plan and has to answer these oral sexs before they proceed.\r\n at that place are usefulnesss and discriminates in this merger. I get out start with the advantages. If this merger goes through, it go forth be a quantum step in Newell’s growth. The merger forget be pairing devil companies that are leaders in their industries. Through the merger, Newell will gain the worldwide presence that Rubbermaid has. Both companies keister create synergy within their divisions and Newell rout out pass their product line externally. There are certain products in Rubbermaid’s product line that Newell does not countenance. Another advantage the merger will create is change magnitude operating income. Some disadvantages of the push-down store are that Newell would be exposed to a tough challenge to the company’s capacity to combine its acquisitions. One big disadvantage is the risk that is involved in the fight for Newell.\r\nNewell is a very respectable company, and a company whose customers are very satisfied. They are very successful with their acquisitions due to their emblematical newellization process. Rubbermaid currently has many problems with their company su ch(prenominal) as bad customer relations, their operations are not lean, increases competition has interpreted away market share, and their financial targets come out unrealistic. Newell needs to understand these problems and realize what they will contain to struggle with if they join with Rubbermaid. Doing my question I have come up with many more disadvantages than advantages toward this merger and that is wherefore I feel that these companies should not merge.\r\nIn today’s business sector world, companies change hands all the succession through mergers and acquisitions. Most of the time, the security propositions of new ventures are disregarded. Company A may have the most secure ne twainrk, but when they mate this network with Company B, you’re exposing your company to a whole new set of risks. The first step is that Newell needs to evaluate the business risk. Reputation loss is an issue, which Newell will be affected by. Rubbermaid has bad customer rela tions because it has angered its most grievous retail buyers with the laboured-handed way it has passed its revolt costs. They have given their competitors a sess of shelf space.\r\nA big question mark comes to my mind is when I recall about how Newell will bring Rubbermaid into the Newellization process. Newellization is expound as a â€Å"well schematic salary improvement and productivity enhancement process that is applied to integrate impudently get wordd product lines.” The newellization process includes the centralization of happen upon administrative functions including data processing, accounting, and EDI, and inauguration of Newell’s rigorous, multi-measure, divisional operating control system. interpret the case analysis, Rubbermaid is super incompetent in these areas. Their operations are one of their biggest problems. jibe to the case, â€Å"although it excels in creativity, product quality, and merchandising, Rubbermaid is showing itself to be a laggard in more mundane areas such as modernizing machinery, eliminating needless jobs, and making deliveries on time.” Looking at Rubbermaid and analyzing their problems, they have totally the opposite qualities of companies that Newell has acquired in the past.\r\nNewell’s acquired companies were mature businesses with unrealized profit possible. Rubbermaid has had a mature business for rather a long time and I do not see any room for unrealized profit potential. They have a very big international presence and Newell will end up hurting themselves once they have to deal with Rubbermaid and their incompetence. I do not feel that the newellization process fits Rubbermaid because these are two companies that have been around for a while, and it is not wish Rubbermaid is a start-up or a moderately recent company that can be changed around quickly and all of the fast have lean operations, which newellization has proved it can do with previous acquisitions. Newel l should stick to their business principle and do what they have make in the past, which is to acquire small to average sized companies and integrate them into the newellization process and create an enormous amount of synergy. I unceasingly believe that one should do something that they go to sleep best or have aim in and not pursue a totally different market in which that have no see to it in.\r\nIn this case, Newell does not have any experience with acquiring a company that is cost billions. A merger example that lately occurred which has turned into a blunder is the AOL snip Warner merger. These were two totally different companies in different industries that thought they could merge and be a giant in the cyberspace and Media/Entertainment industry. The outcome of this merger is that the chief operating officer’s of both companies are beingness laughed at in the business world. AOL clip Warner stock worth is in the cut down and the company is in real trouble . Newell can avoid all this by once again looking at their previous acquisitions and beholding what type of companies they acquired, which were companies with unrealized profit potential and who had the ability to create synergy in a short amount of time with Newell’s existing divisions.\r\nIn conclusion, the deal is attractive for Newell but is not worth(predicate) the risk that is involved. The key to merger and acquisitions is to not jump on your first replete(predicate) and just merge or acquire a company that’s price looks cheap. You have to determine what the company will look like in the future. omit of foresight will cause a huge problem. Rising raw actual costs along with Rubbermaid’s usable problems will impair the whole newellization process. Rubbermaid has very sour relationships with their clients and Newell will have an extremely difficult time fixing those relationships. If the two companies merge, only investors or individuals who follow b usiness news will know that these two companies are one. The average customer will still know of Rubbermaid as Rubbermaid. I feel that Rubbermaid brings a lot of heavy baggage to the table and will hurt the smooth and exemplary business that Newell has attained.\r\n'