Is a Discovery an Invention or Is an Invention a Discovery

Is a stripping an invention or Is an Invention a discovery? This Is peerless question that can probably never be answered. A discovery can be be as something which already existed, and is excavated after bingle nonices it or proves its existence . Invention is the creation of something which didnt exist before it was created by a genius mind . For instance, Newton discovered the existence of temperance when an apple fell on his head. It did exist before Newton realizes its existence, plainly then why TLD any iodine else notice Its existence except him? Hence It Is give tongue to that Newton discovered gravity.Whereas on the some other hand Thomas Alva Edison was the front person to work the electric bulb and his technology was a frustrate of his brain which didnt exist before he created it, hence it is said to be an invention. Almost all Areas of knowledge namely History, Art, Natural Science, Mathematics, Human wisdom and morality atomic number 18 both discovered and invented if different point of gains atomic number 18 taken into consideration. Is mathematicsematics invented or discovered? There are cardinal questions which arise In the minds of people when they think of this. If math was discovered. Where and how Is one just tinting for It? Is mathematics a language?The way poets add sm imposture words to English making it more understandable and communicative does a mathematician do the identical with numbers to make it as connected and expressive it is? Or did they just point out at things which ceaselessly existed unless were waiting to be discovered. And if it was that, then why it did solitary(prenominal) appear to these great(p) minds and not to common men. How could Newton and Leibniz, who stayed seas apart, come up to almost the kindred shutdowns regarding calculus, In the same time period? Since they did reach at the same conclusions, their source of knowledge could in any case be similar hence math could be discovered. On the other hand if math was invented, why wouldnt we see the law in 2+2=5? Mathematics is based on a set of Axioms or what we call postulates which are basically statements that are assumed to be true without a proof. Therefore if 2+2=4 is an axiom without a proof, why do we believe so deep In It and use It In our dally affairs If thither Is no possible proof to back It up? And If It were to be true, why wouldnt a new-fangled concept of 2+2=5&8243 plunk for truth If a mathematician has come up with It with his own sensible search? Therefore mathematics can be invented. Human efforts to imitate, supplement, alter, or prevent the work of nature. One of the most controversial areas of knowledge is art. This is mainly because art is not definite as peoples definition of art is highly subjective. What business leader appeal to my eyes may not appeal to someone elses eye. For a person a cave could be artistic, while for another it could be Just another cave. Therefore art depends on peoples perception. Some artists set about to find creativity in already existing things. For instance, an artist walk by a tree denuded realizes that the tree resembles a woman.For him, that is a piece of art, which always existed, hence was discovered. However, that tree may not take care like a woman to another person and may look Just like a tree. Some artists invent something and call it a piece of art. For instance, if an artist carves a woman out of a tree, en NAS invented that piece tot art. But again it may not of necessity appeal to others as an artwork. There is also a third view point to this. If I make a statement, l am hungry, it is uncomplete invented nor discovered. It is only the expression of my Houghton/feelings. The thought was created and brought out through the medium on language.Art too is a language used to express ones creativity. It is only a medium and is neither invented nor discovered, it is only created. What is it that clouds every human decis ion? What is it that forms a base line for the humans to understand whether what they are doing is right or wrong? What is it thats forms the human conscience? It is ethical motive. Ethics can be defined as, A set of principles of right conduct. Ethics are a disposition of rules which one has to follow to maintain a good conduct in the society. Our decisions and thoughts are completely governed by our ethics. Ethics are forced into us since our young early days.Every one at some point or the other remembers their parents telling them in their adolescence, One should never lie, one should always keep their anger in their control, and one should always bow their head before the great God. What are these that our parents are teaching us? These are ethics. These develop overtime and then they make us responsible humans. Were ethics invented or were they discovered? Lets take for example, a simile between the Indian culture and the Western culture a few cascades back. When widow remar riage was a taboo in the Indian culture, it was at accepted in the western culture.In India, ones a husband expired because of what so ever reasons, the wife had to sit on his dead body and the family members would burn down the living wife to death along with the dead husband. According to them, then, marriages were pairs do by God and sent to Earth. Therefore if the husband dies, the wife is also killed hence they stay in pairs even after death. That were the ethics of Indians at that time, where as the western had a totally opposite culture. If a Cubans died or endorse versa, the other one could get remarried and settle down with a new family.Therefore if the kinds of ethics thought to humans are differentiated on the bases of factors, in this case, Religion, then ethics is to be invented. On the other hand when it is believed that violent death people for our selfish meaner is not a good conduct. Robbing, abusing, insulting others is not the right thing to do. What are these ? These are also ethics, nevertheless the only difference is that these are accepted world- wide. Maybe some countries have a small punishment for it and other have a terrible en but at the end everyone believes that it isnt the right thing to do.Then how are these ethics not differentiated on the bases of religion or any other factors symbolizing diversity? This might be because ethics might be discovered and their source of discovery is either the same or it is similar. This is because if the conclusion of two problems is the same, either their source is similar or the same. Therefore ethics can either be invented or discovered or by chance created my religion or religious preachers in the olden times but nothing can be said with complete certainty.